Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all make sure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made obvious that police is free to choose action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities matter to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-discipline duties within the interim period. Read more

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Lots of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) will also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and proficiently.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it truly is unclear the way it relates to any presented situation, typically rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers as well as circumstances of your case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for future similar cases.

ten. Without touching the merits of the case on the issue of once-a-year increases inside the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in read more writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity in the spend scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is within the obvious negation with the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more

Carrying out a case legislation search could be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, including:

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and contain all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.